Catégorie : PE in english Page 5 of 11

Une sélection d’articles traduits en anglais, et en accès libre

The Direction of France’s Foreign Policy over The Next Thirty Years

This article is the English version of Thierry de Montbrial,
« La politique étrangère de la France : un cap pour les trente prochaines années », published in Politique étrangère, Vol. 87, Issue 4, 2021.

En arrière-plan, carte de la France et des pays européens voisins. Drapeau de la France planté avec un bâton en bois sur la carte. Couverture de la revue "Politique étrangère" n° 4 de 2021, "Europe, sorties de crises" (logo "PE" vert).

The first potential confusion to avoid is a benign but nonetheless problematic one between what we call “geopolitics” and “political geography.” In France, we often use Yves Lacoste’s definition of geopolitics as the “representations” relating to different territories, but I prefer to define it more explicitly as the “ideologies” relating to different territories. Here I use the word ideology to mean a “system of ideas.” What we think about geographic areas, and their populations, is not an abstract representation but is deeply rooted in each of our individual hearts and minds, in ideological assemblages that also provide a cover for various interests.

Preparing for 2050: From foresight to grand strategy

This article is the English version of Martin Briens and Thomas Gomart, « Comment préparer 2050 ? De la « prévoyance » à la « grande stratégie » », published in Politique étrangère, Vol. 87, Issue 4, 2021.

Arrière-plan : une personne joue aux échecs, elle tient une pièce blanche dans la main, les pièces noires sont renversées.
Premier plan : couverture du numéro 4 de 2021 de la revue Politique Étrangère, "Europe, sorties de crises", logo de la revue en vert.

“Nothing is more necessary in governing a state than foresight, since by its use one can easily prevent many evils which can be corrected only with great difficulty if allowed to transpire,” observed Cardinal Richelieu, adding that “it is more important to anticipate the future than to dwell upon the present, since with enemies of the state, as with diseases, it is better to advance to the attack than to wait and drive them out after they have invaded.” This evident but often forgotten truth points to the need for France to rethink its foresight systems, amid a strategic acceleration that is making long-term planning a matter of urgency.

Game Over: Western military interventionism, 1991–2021

This article is the English version of: Louis Gautier« Fin de partie : retour sur l’interventionnisme militaire occidental, 1991-2021 », published in Politique étrangère, Vol. 87, Issue 4, 2021.

Premier plan : couverture de la revue Politique Étrangère n° 4/2021, "Europe, sorties de crises" avec le logo "PE" en vert.
Fond : un militaire américain pointe son arme devant lui.

On August 31, 2021, after twenty years of war against the Taliban, American troops withdrew from Afghanistan. This brought an end to the longest conflict ever waged by the United States (US), and marked the final phase of disengagement of the US’s military resources, which had been deployed on a massive scale in the Middle East since 2001. It indicated an operational change in the fight against terrorism, now no longer an open declared war, but once again a covert war. Most commentators drew a line under the event as an end to the sequence that began on September 11, 2001. But on a more fundamental level, the withdrawal from Afghanistan signaled an end to the policy of military interventionism pursued by the West since 1991.

European economic governance: Past errors and future promises

This article is the English version of: Vivien A. Schmidt, « Gouvernance économique européenne : entre erreurs passées et promesses d’avenir », published in Politique étrangère, Vol. 87, Issue 4, 2021.

Image de fond avec les drapeaux de l'Union européenne, couverture du numéro 4 de 2021 de la revue Politique Étrangère.

The responses to the Covid-19 crisis, in which the rules of the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) were suspended and the European Union (EU) took on significant EU level debt for the purposes of redistributive solidarity, constitute a great leap forward for the EU. They also represent a tacit acknowledgment that the policies put in place in response to the Eurozone crisis, focused on “governing by rules and ruling by numbers”, with punitive conditionality for countries in trouble, were not fit for purpose. The question for today is: Will the EU go back to the status quo ante of the Eurozone, focused on rules-based, numbers-targeting governance, with limited common EU instruments for investment in the future? Or will it instead move beyond the Eurozone and Covid-19 crisis effectively and democratically, toward more sustainable and equitable growth and prosperity for all Europeans?

Page 5 of 11

Fièrement propulsé par WordPress & Thème par Anders Norén